6/19/2007

Chris Matthews throws watermellon-sized softballs to Democratic candidates...


Chris Matthews might as well have let the candidates choose the questions he was going to ask him today during MSNBC's "Super Tuesday" joke, and he spent more time facilitating the anti-Bush talking points and exchanging banter with the embarrassingly disrespectful crowd than he spent pressing the candidates about the issues. It was almost as pathetic as his interview with Nancy Pelosi, which left him looking like a star-struck teenager as he literally answered each question in the process of asking it while simultaneously drooling all over himself.

The most infuriating question so far was his lame attempt at pressing John Edwards about what he WOULD HAVE DONE IF HE WAS PRESIDENT DURING HURRICANE KATRINA! What an absolute joke. Nobody could stop what happened in New Orleans, NOBODY, and what good does it do the city to belabor the issue of how the initial response was managed? Is it not more important that we realistically address what we are going to do with New Orleans from today forward? It is irresponsible to dodge the matter of whether or not we are actually going to rebuild below sea level, which should be at the top of the Democrats list of things to avoid considering they have all embraced Al Gore's forecast of a several meter rise in global sea levels. Where is the justice in rebuilding people's homes in a place that might be completely indefensible against the forces of nature ten or fifteen years down the road? Clearly this is too complicated for Chris Matthews to wrap his mind around.

Well, as usual Matthews delivers on his daily unspoken promise to wet himself in the presence of the modern day "Bobby Kennedy", as he ridiculously referred to Barack Obama, who apparently captures all of the "magic" that Chris is still clinging onto from his free love and world peace college years. There are two different Chris Matthews; the bulldog that doesn't let Republicans finish a sentence that casts Bush in a positive light, and there is the fourteen year-old school girl who stares dumbstruck at his 'heroes' and lets them get away with intentional distortion of history and marginalization of the future.

That is just my take though.

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Actually government COULD have funded the Corps of Engineers enough to build levees that WORKED to their design specifications. Then New Orleans would have survived Katrina battered but whole. Instead the levees broke, leadership on all levels was no where to be seen and the trust I had in my government was lost forever.

Brian T. Edwards said...

If you are going to seriously blame the government for the HURRICANE that didn't even hit New Orleans directly and still toppled the levees, then you need to step back and reassess the power of nature. It was not Bush's fault that the cities flooded, it was the idiots who built inferior levees decades ago. Actually, it is the fault of the idiot who decided to build the city there in the first place.

You are right, the local/state government could have evacuated the city, or helped the people who chose to stay understand the understand how idiotic they were, but Bush was the least culpable politician in the entire situation. Thanks to Kanye and idiots in Louisiana like Ray Nagin and Gov. Landreau, Bush is beat like a pinata by partisan hacks like John Edwards who would like us all to believe that Bush could have somehow stopped the storm from toppling the levees. Maybe he should have had the army corp of engineers raise the city above sea level real quick before it reached shore? We all know how intimate his relationship with God is, he should have used one of his favors.