Restoring Perspective: Damn You Baby Boomers

The root of the 'too big to fail' argument extends back to the Bear Stearns fire sale to Chase and the subsequent liquidity injections for Freddie and Fannie. This should have been evident to everyone when Dick Fuld, CEO of Lehman Brothers, clearly expected to receive a bailout or forced acquisition from his former rival and fellow investment banker Hank Paulson, only to be shown the door by a devilishly righteous Treasury Secretary when zero hour struck.

The grin was wiped off Henry's face seemingly overnight, and all of a sudden we had TARP and 'toxic' aka 'distressed' aka 'legacy' assests that the Federal government desperately needed $700B overnight to purchase all of these rotten investments from the banks before the world was going to end. You can, and should, read documents recently made public in a Freedom of Information Act challenge by Judicial Watch to get a full appreciation for the both the tremendously historic nature of the TARP program, as well as the cavalier attitudes taken by those charged with its design.

Here we find our selves in retrospect with the terms 'too big to fail' or 'systemically critical' becoming matters of daily business in DC, I think everyone needs to watch this FRONTLINE episodes "Inside the Meltdown" and "Ten Trillion and Counting" to get a refresher on exactly the extent of our obligations and the blatant disregard for long-term sustainability demonstrated by policymakers. As it turns out failure during tough times is every bit as critical to survival of our capitalist system as success and prosperity during boom times.

I blame it all on the irresponsible and self-absorbed baby boomers. I look forward to the day when our parent's generation can no longer find a job because their skills are useless, which should be around the same time our government finally acknowledges that Social Security is gone and never coming back just like their 401k and eTrade account.

As long as the members of the UAW don't suffer hard times today, the rest of us won't be too pissed off at the government when that inevitable day does arrive, right?? Screw the unions, screw the banks, screw the newspapers; let them fail and hope they drag their irresponsible middle-aged managers right out of the workforce with them because their salvation is coming at the expense of our civilization's slow and painful demise.

Behind the Financial Bailout: Treasury documents and internal e-mails in the days before TARP

There are few weeks in American history as epic and significant as those leading up to TARP. See the embedded document below, courtesy of Zero Hedge, for a glimpse into the Treasury Department managed by an Investment Banker and judge for yourself the historical implications. 
Treasury CEO Talking Points v1

Publish at Scribd or explore others: School Work Non-fiction england symbols

Moral Hazard: Wall Street to Detroit to California??

The following is an excerpt from the March 16, 2008, edition of "FOX News Sunday With Chris Wallace":

WALLACE: But there's an overarching philosophical and policy question here that I want to try to get at with you about the government's role.
Why should the government, and thereby U.S. taxpayers, bail out lenders and borrowers who made bad decisions? And if they know they're going to be bailed out, what does that do to the moral hazard argument that they don't end up paying a price?

HANK PAULSON: Well, first of all, I really understand the moral hazard argument. So on the one hand, you've got a moral hazard. On the other, you've got what's right for the markets, what's right for the stability of the financial system, the U.S. economy.
All of these situations are situation-specific, depending on what's going on in the markets at the time. You're jumping to a conclusion about what the cost is going to be to U.S. taxpayer. So I just want to point that out.
And this situation hasn't played out yet. And wait and see how that plays out.
But to get to your general question, this is something that — you need to balance these two considerations. And I would say at this time, given where we are, and given how important it is to minimize disruptions in our capital markets, and how important it is to protect the economy which you were talking about earlier, this was the right decision.

The reason we are bailing out GM and Chrysler is that the government has deemed them both "too big to fail". I think this is ridiculous and nothing more than a convenient explanation for a very inconvenient reality which allows politicians to claim they are acting in the good of all taxpayers by bailing out the car companies. Below is a post by Robert Reich from October 2008 in which he directly addresses this concept:

According to Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, the biggest Wall Street banks now getting money from the government are just "too big to fail.” Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke uses a different euphemism – he calls them “systemically critical.” The point is that if any of them goes down, it could take the whole financial system with it. So we taxpayers have to keep them up.

We’re hearing the same argument elsewhere in Washington for saving General Motors. It’s just “too big to fail.” So Congress is considering a bailout that would keep GM afloat and sweeten a merger between GM and Chrysler.

Pardon me for asking, but if a company is too big to fail, maybe – just maybe – it’s too big, period.

Reich makes an excellent point, but hardly addresses how to overcome this misconception that anything can be too big to fail. Very few policymakers are willing to acknowledge that there should be no such thing as "too big to fail" because the consequences of failure may cost them their jobs and influence, which is unfortunate because I thought the whole point was to eliminate all of the systemic risk in the system, not keep the same idiots who got us here in their jobs.

This doesn't even get into the reality that the car market in the US has hit a saturation point and people don't need to buy cars as bad as GM would like us to believe. Even if this Chapter 11 plan works and GM restructures into a more efficient entity, is the government gonna subsidize American households to buy a new GM car to maximize the value of their equity stake? Will they pass laws that create disincentive to buy foreign cars? I just don't see an end-game in the whole auto bailout, but if anyone has any ideas I would be happy to hear what they have to say. 

I consider the Obama team to be essentially a bunch of well intended control freaks who consider it there duty to do something, anything, to avert failure. I am eager to see what happens when California fails, which is no longer just a possibility, it is absolutely inevitable. Bailing out California as a state somehow "too big to fail" would be disasterous because no matter what terms the Fed's impose on California, there is no way we can trust them to fix the underlying problems that caused the state to go into this irrecoverable nose-dive in the first place (problems we can certainly get into if anyone is interested).

Where does the Moral Hazard end?

Nassim Nicholas Taleb explains his Black Swan theory...

PandemicFlu.gov: Public Health in the Connected Age...

(Originally posted on the Connect Health Care Blog)

The Federal government has launched an intensive web-driven campaign through a new platform at PandemicFlu.gov to disseminate information on potential pandemic-level flu outbreaks. Each state has its own sub-site linked into the broader federal platform, with an impressive coordination of relevant information across a large network of local interests.

Several other Federal, State and NGO information outlets have also done a great job of distributing tools to connected citizens that can be used to quickly share and discover information across web-based communities. Some examples include:

CDC Index of Public Health Social Media Tools
CDC YouTube Channel
CDC Swine Flu Portal
WHO Influenza A(H1N1)
CDC-TV (see below)

Red Cross Pandemic Influenza Portal

Social media tools are readily available to bloggers through both the CDC and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), which both have over a dozen unique embeddable widgets which automatically update with the latest public health information.

The State Department and DoD have information geared to American's living abroad or with global connections which may leave an individual particularly vulnerable.

State Department Pandemic Influenza Fact Sheet

DoD Pandemic Influenza Watchboard

Obama on Swine Flu

Related articles by Zemanta

• Oh my God! Swine Flu OutBreak (funtoosurf.com)
• Swine flu roots traced to Spanish flu (cbc.ca)
• Sharper picture of swine flu virus outbreak begins to emerge (cbc.ca)
• Facts on an Unusual Swine Flu Mix (grantlawrence.blogspot.com)
• Is swine flu as deadly as we thought? (guardian.co.uk)
• 2009 Swine Flu Outbreak News Coverage Initiated on Ulitzer (web2.sys-con.com)